Compare
WordPress runs a large share of the web and is often the right answer. For B2B sites that need speed and security with little upkeep, Next.js is often a better one. Here is the comparison.
| Criterion | WordPress | Next.js with a headless CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Security upkeep | Core, theme and plugin updates every month | Static pages, few moving parts |
| Page speed | Depends on theme and plugins | Fast by default |
| Editing | Familiar editor, many plugins | Structured content with previews |
| Hosting | Managed WordPress hosting | Static hosting, often free or cheap |
| Total cost over three years | Lower build, higher upkeep | Higher build, lower upkeep |
| Developer pool | Very large | Large and growing |
A multi-page company site with custom design and a CMS your team can edit without us.
from$8,500
4-5 weeks2 revision rounds per stage8 page templates included
A new design and build for your current site that keeps the rankings, links and leads it has earned.
from$9,500
5-6 weeks2 revision rounds per stage8 page templates included
WordPress itself is maintained well. Most incidents come from outdated plugins and themes. A static Next.js site simply has far fewer parts that can go out of date.
Yes. WordPress can feed a Next.js front end through its API, which keeps the editor your team knows and removes the theme layer.
For a typical B2B site of 8-15 templates, about five to seven weeks as a website redesign, with the redirect map included. Launch monitoring then runs for 30 days.
Our website redesign process, step by step, shown on a fintech project: audit, brief, structure, trust patterns, mockups, migration and an itemized estimate.
How to choose a headless CMS for B2B websites: when you need one, what matters to marketing teams, and how hosted, open-source and git-based options compare.